Love v. Rockwall Independent School Dist.

225 S.W. 263, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 1013
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 1920
DocketNo. 8187. [fn*]
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 225 S.W. 263 (Love v. Rockwall Independent School Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. Rockwall Independent School Dist., 225 S.W. 263, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 1013 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

RAINEY, C. J.

The appellant, Love, owning land in the territory annexed by an act of the state Legislature to the Rockwall indépendent school district, brought this suit against the trustees of said Rockwall independent school district, and alleged for cause of action as follows:

*264 “(1) That heretofore, in the year 1909, common school district No. 2 of Rockwall county, Tex., voted and issued school bonds for building purposes in the amount of $25,000, said bonds maturing 40 years from date, together with an authorization of the levy and collection of a tax of 25 cents on the $100 valuation on all taxable property within said district to create a fund with which to pay interest on said bonds at the rate of 5 per cent, and a sinking fund to redeem said bonds at maturity. The bonds were issued and sold, and the proceeds thereof used in the erection of a school building in said common school district No. 2. Thereafter, in the year 1913, the Legislature created the Rockwall independent school district. That the territory constituting the independent school district included all the common school district No. 2, and other adjacent territory not theretofore within common school district No. 2.
“(2) Luring the year 1917 $5,500 of the principal of said indebtedness was paid by the trustees of said independent school district, and there is now outstanding and unpaid bonds in the principal sum of $18,500, which will mature in about 33 years from this date. .
“(3) That on the 25th day of August, 1917, at an election held within the said independent school district, a majority of the qualified voter's therein voted in favor of the issuance of refunding bonds in the sum of $18,500 payable 33 years from their date, and bearing interest at the rate of 5 per cent, per annum for the purpose of taking up, paying off, and discharging in full the outstanding bonded indebtedness of common school district No. 2, which outstanding bonded indebtedness was created long prior to the creation of Rockwall independent school district, as aforesaid. In the order providing for said election, in the notice thereof, and in the order declaring the result thereof, it was specifically stated that said election was for the purpose of voting new bonds with which to refund said outstanding bonded indebtedness theretofore voted by common school district No. 2. The order of election and the notice thereof provide that the voters of said election shall be annually levied, assessed, and collected on all the taxable property in said district for the year 1917, and annually thereafter while such bonds or any of them are outstanding a tax sufficient to pay the current interest on said bonds, and provide a sinking fund sufficient to pay_ the principal at maturity, but said order and’notice do not state the maximum rate, or any rate, which may be levied by the board of trustees for said independent school district.
“That thereafter, on the - day of August, 1917, the said board of trustees made and entered its order declaring the result of election, and- therein provided for the issuance of said refunding bonds, and passed and entered its order levying a tax of 15 cents on the $100 valuation on all taxable property in said independent school district, and its order providing for the collection of such tax for the purpose of paying interest on said new refunding bonds for the year 1917, and to provide for a portion of the sinking fund with which to redeem said refunding bonds at maturity. That the county tax assessor for Rockwall county was ordered by the said board of trustees to assess said taxes, which was accordingly done, and the tax collector, R. E. Maclin, one of the defendants herein, was ordered to collect said tax.
“(4) No separate tax roll has ever been made for Rockwall independent school district and approved as required by law. That the said R. E. Maclin, tax collector, has been collecting the taxes from the taxpayers in Rockwall independent school district, both those living within the territory added to common school district No. 2 as well as those living within the territory which originally comprised said common school district No. 2, and such collections have been made in obedience to the order of said board of trustees as aforesaid. That the plaintiff owns land and taxable property lying both within the territory formerly comprising common school district No. 2 and also in the territory added thereto in the creation of said independent school district; that plaintiff is willing and has offered to pay his state and county taxes to the tax collector, and is willing to pay any legitimate school tax properly and legally assessed against his property in said independent school district, but the tax collector refuses to accept the payment of the taxes which plaintiff would show to be legal without the payment of the illegal taxes also:
“(5) At the time of the levy of the 15-cent bond tax aforesaid the said board of trustees also made and entered its order in a like manner, providing for the levy, assessing, and collecting of a tax of 35 cents on the $100' valuation for the purpose of maintaining the public schools in said district.
“That the taxable property within the territory formerly common school district No. 2 is of the value of $750,000'; that a tax of 20 cents on the $100 is required to pay the current interest annually on said old bonds, and create a sinking fund sufficient to pay the principal at maturity.
“That the laws and Constitution of the state prohibit a greater tax than 50 cents on the $100 for bonded indebtedness and maintenance combined; that, after levying and collecting of the tax of 20 cents for the bonded indebtedness, the greatest rate that can be-levied and collected for maintenance purposes is 30 cents on the $100.
“(6) That, although the voters in said independent school district at said election held in August, 1917, voted for said refunding bonds, and for a tax with which to discharge them, the said board of trustees has failed and refused to issue said refunding bonds, and has failed and refused to replace the old bonds with such refunding bonds as such board by such election was authorized and ordered to do. That the only bonds that have ever been issued are the outstanding unpaid bonds of the old issue by common school district No. 2, and no bonds whatever have ever been issued, and there is now no outstanding bonded indebtedness against the Rockwall independent school district, and there is no authority in law for the levying, assessing, and collecting of taxes against the taxable property in Rockwall independent school district in the absence of the existence of an outstanding bonded indebtedness against said independent school district.
“That the only authority conferred by the *265 Constitution of this state upon said board trustees is the authority to levy and collect sufficient taxes against the taxable property situated. in the territory comprising common school district No. 2 with which to pay the bonded indebtedness created, by said common school district No. 2, now outstanding. of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Love v. Rockwall Independent School Dist.
238 S.W. 642 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 S.W. 263, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-rockwall-independent-school-dist-texapp-1920.