Love v. Payton
This text of 1 Tenn. 254 (Love v. Payton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case. — The second count stated an order drawn by the defendant on William Love, the plaintiff, in favor of Abner Bush, for a horse, stating that he would be security for the payment of the horse. An order was produced directed to David Love, upon which William Love, the plaintiff, delivered the horse to Bush. Evidence of the handwriting cannot be received; Bush's testimony would be the best evidence; this is admitted at the bar. By the English practice, if a witness be beyond the reach of the process of the: court, secondary evidence may be received.1 This has not been our practice, where the evidence, of a witness is known to be in another State, his deposition ought to be taken. It is admitted that Bush is in Ohio, and the circumstance of his telling the counsel that he would not attend cannot alter the case.
Nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Tenn. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-payton-tennsuperct-1807.