Love v. Mustafa

District Court, N.D. California·Decided February 8, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-02071·Unknown

Opinion

SAMUEL LOVE, Case No. 20-cv-02071-PJH (AGT)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE v. JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

The court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse’s Report and Recommendation Re: Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment. The court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) permits a court, following default by a defendant, to enter default judgment in a case. “The district court’s decision whether to enter default judgment is a discretionary one.” Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). “However, necessary facts not contained in the pleadings, and claims which are legally insufficient, are not established by default.” Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 980 F.2d 1261, 1267 (9th Cir. 1992). Plaintiff’s complaint, as described by Judge Tse, is not well-pled. Although defendant’s default has been entered by the Clerk, the factual allegations of Plaintiff’s complaint must support a judgment. Thus, if plaintiff hopes to secure a judgment, he must cure the deficiencies noted in Judge Tse’s Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The deadline for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint, serve it on defendant, and submit a thereafter file a revised motion for default judgment. Dated: February 8, 2021 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton__________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Love v. Mustafa, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Love v. Mustafa (Love v. Mustafa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related