Love v. Murry
This text of 100 So. 277 (Love v. Murry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only question involved in this ease is whether or not money belonging to the state of Mississippi, deposited in a bank which has not qualified as a state depository, is protected by the state bank guaranty fund.
The identical question was decided by this court recently in Wardlaw v. Planters’ Bank of Clarksdale, 131 Miss. 93, 95 So. 135, in which it is held that the funds of a municipality in such a case are protected by the state bank guaranty fund. The same rule applies here, and we decline to overrule the Wardlaw case; therefore the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 So. 277, 135 Miss. 749, 1924 Miss. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-murry-miss-1924.