Love v. Murphy
This text of Love v. Murphy (Love v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1415
MARK C. LOVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH F. MURPHY, JR.; DEBORAH S. EYLER; ARRIE W. DAVIS; PETER B. KRAUSER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-682-CCB)
Submitted: August 9, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark C. Love, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Mark C. Love appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion for temporary and permanent injunctive relief and subsequent
dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed the record, Love’s
brief, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Love v. Murphy, No. CA-02-682-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 8 & Apr.
1, 2002). We deny Love’s request for oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Love v. Murphy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-murphy-ca4-2002.