Love v. Murphy

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 11, 2002
Docket02-1415
StatusUnpublished

This text of Love v. Murphy (Love v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. Murphy, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1415

MARK C. LOVE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH F. MURPHY, JR.; DEBORAH S. EYLER; ARRIE W. DAVIS; PETER B. KRAUSER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 02-682-CCB)

Submitted: August 9, 2002 Decided: September 11, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark C. Love, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Mark C. Love appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for temporary and permanent injunctive relief and subsequent

dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed the record, Love’s

brief, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Love v. Murphy, No. CA-02-682-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 8 & Apr.

1, 2002). We deny Love’s request for oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Love v. Murphy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-murphy-ca4-2002.