Love v. Love

809 S.W.2d 481, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 1991 WL 94133
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 4, 1991
DocketNo. 58926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 809 S.W.2d 481 (Love v. Love) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. Love, 809 S.W.2d 481, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 1991 WL 94133 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

KAROHL, Judge.

Appellant father and respondent mother were divorced on May 16, 1979. Father filed the petition which must have alleged the birth of four children of the marriage because mother did not file pleadings. Dissolution was granted by default to father. The dissolution court granted mother custody of four children who were then thirteen, ten, nine and seven and ordered father to pay mother “the sum of $35 per week per child as and for child support.” On June 23, 1987, father filed a second amended motion to modify and set aside the order of child support alleging he did not father three of the children. The court granted guardian ad litem’s motion to dismiss and/or strike the portion of father’s motion challenging paternity. Father appeals.

The law is settled that father is collaterally estopped from denying his paternity of the children because the issue of paternity was established by the decree of dissolution which is now final. See Miller v. Hubbert, 804 S.W.2d 819, 820 (Mo.App.1991); K.E.A. v. T.A.A., 765 S.W.2d 389, 391 (Mo.App.1989); In re Marriage of [482]*482Campbell, 741 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Mo.App.1987).

Judgment is affirmed.

PUDLOWSKI, P.J., and GRIMM, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dane v. Hagerty
976 S.W.2d 633 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
809 S.W.2d 481, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 768, 1991 WL 94133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-love-moctapp-1991.