Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Love v. Anderson

Love v. Anderson

16 S.E. 68, 89 Ga. 612
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 2, 1892·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[612]*612 Judgment affirmed. On cross-bill of exceptions, reversed,.

John M. Slaton, for plaintiffs in error. George S. Thomas, George Hillyer and S. N. Connally, for plaintiffs in error in cross-bill. Porter King, for the administrator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Love v. Anderson, 16 S.E. 68, 89 Ga. 612 (Ga. 1892).

16 S.E. 68 (Love v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aiken v. Weldon
76 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Walton v. Henderson
61 S.E. 28 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Huntress v. Anderson
35 S.E. 671 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Taylor v. James
34 S.E. 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Towns v. Mathews
17 S.E. 955 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)