Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Love v. Anderson

Love v. Anderson

16 S.E. 68, 89 Ga. 612
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 2, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 16 S.E. 68 (Love v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love v. Anderson, 16 S.E. 68, 89 Ga. 612 (Ga. 1892).

Opinion

[612]*612 Judgment affirmed. On cross-bill of exceptions, reversed,.

John M. Slaton, for plaintiffs in error. George S. Thomas, George Hillyer and S. N. Connally, for plaintiffs in error in cross-bill. Porter King, for the administrator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aiken v. Weldon
76 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Walton v. Henderson
61 S.E. 28 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Huntress v. Anderson
35 S.E. 671 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Taylor v. James
34 S.E. 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Towns v. Mathews
17 S.E. 955 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 S.E. 68, 89 Ga. 612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-v-anderson-ga-1892.