Love Taylor, Jr. v. United States
This text of 835 F.2d 879 (Love Taylor, Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Love TAYLOR, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 87-1265.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 10, 1987.
Before KEITH and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS G. HULL, District Judge.*
ORDER
This pro se federal prisoner appeals the district court's judgment denying his motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. This matter has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).
Petitioner asserted claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, inadequate medical care, inaccuracies in the presentence report, and abuse of discretion in sentencing. The district court denied the motion because petitioner failed to state a claim for relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255.
Upon consideration, we affirm the district court's judgment denying the motion for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion and order of February 20, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
835 F.2d 879, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16177, 1987 WL 24082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-taylor-jr-v-united-states-ca6-1987.