Love Securities v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Love Securities v. Berman

31 A.D.2d 806, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 806 (Love Securities v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Love Securities v. Berman, 31 A.D.2d 806, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion for reargument granted without costs and upon reconsideration, our previous order is modified to the extent of remanding the matter to Special Term for consideration of- the issue as to whether the determination by the administrator that the premises were subject to rent control was a proper one, and in all other respects we adhere to our previous decision. In view of' the stipulation by petitioner that in the event the premises were finally found to be subject to rent control, it would not protest a finding by the administrator concerning the amount of maximum rents, thus permitting a final determination of the matter, the petitioner’s application should not be considered as being premature. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion for reargument granted without costs and upon reconsideration, our previous order is modified to the extent of remanding the matter to Special Term for consideration of- the issue as to whether the determination by the administrator that the premises were subject to rent control was a proper one, and in all other respects we adhere to our previous decision. In view of' the stipulation by petitioner that in the event the premises were finally found to be subject to rent control, it would not protest a finding by the administrator concerning the amount of maximum rents, thus permitting a final determination of the matter, the petitioner’s application should not be considered as being premature. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, Rabin and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 806, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-securities-v-berman-nyappdiv-1969.