Love and Madness, Inc. v. Claire's Holdings LLC.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJuly 15, 2021
Docket1:21-cv-01913
StatusUnknown

This text of Love and Madness, Inc. v. Claire's Holdings LLC. (Love and Madness, Inc. v. Claire's Holdings LLC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Love and Madness, Inc. v. Claire's Holdings LLC., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

DANO VIEIN I ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #:

LOVE AND MADNESS, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 21 Civ. 01913 (AT) -against- STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT CLAIRE’S HOLDINGS LLC; CBI AND [PROPOSED] DISTRIBUTING CORP. D/B/A “CLAIRE’S”, PROTECTIVE ORDER “ICING”, “CLAIRE’S ACCESSORIES” AND “ICING BY CLAIRE’S”; CLAIRE’S ACCESSORIES UK LTD.; AND CLAIRE’S STORE’S INC.,

Defendants.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Love and Madness, Inc. (“Plaintiff or “L&M”) and Defendants Claire’s Holdings LLC; CBI Distributing Corp.; Claire’s Accessories UK Ltd., and Claire’s Stores Inc. (collectively “Defendants”), together the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that this Court issue a Protective Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Order including without limitation the Parties to this action (including their respective corporate parents, successors, and assigns), their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order □□□□ adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt:

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation is warranted. In particular, both Plaintiff and Defendants design, manufacture and sell beauty products, jewelry, tattoos, face gems and stickers, and accessories in the United States market and abroad and this lawsuit involves claims alleged by Plaintiff that Defendants have infringed upon its intellectual property rights to protected designs and misappropriated other confidential and proprietary business information from Plaintiff. Additionally, it is anticipated that discovery will include previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins). Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. a DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 2.3. Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff).

2.4 Designated House Counsel: House Counsel who are designated as being qualified to access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information in this matter. 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates Disclosure or Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.7. Expert: a person who has been retained by or is in consultation with a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action who are not involved in competitive decision making. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2.12 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staff). 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material

in this action. 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information; (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. Not later than twenty-one (21) days before trial in this litigation, counsel for the parties agree to mect and confer concerning the use at trial of Protected Material.

4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)
In re Estate of Yudkin
2021 CO 2 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Love and Madness, Inc. v. Claire's Holdings LLC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/love-and-madness-inc-v-claires-holdings-llc-nysd-2021.