Louvon Worthern Burroughs v. Angela Corey

Eleventh Circuit

Louvon Worthern Burroughs v. Angela Corey

647 F. App'x 967

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 12, 2016

Docket15-11251

StatusUnpublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 647 F. App'x 967 (Louvon Worthern Burroughs v. Angela Corey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louvon Worthern Burroughs v. Angela Corey, 647 F. App'x 967 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s February 18, 2015 order denying plaintiff Louvon Burroughs’s motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing Burroughs’s first amended complaint with prejudice. We find that Burroughs has likely waived her principal arguments on appeal because they either were not raised in the district court or are materially different from the arguments she raised in the district court. In any event, we conclude that Burroughs’s constitutional facial challenge to the “cyber-stalking provision” of Florida’s stalking statute, Fla. Stat. § 784.048, fails based on the particular record in this case and the limited nature of the arguments, on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s February 18, 2015 order denying plaintiff Louvon Burroughs’s motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing Burroughs’s first amended complaint with prejudice. We find that Burroughs has likely waived her principal arguments on appeal because they either were not raised in the district court or are materially different from the arguments she raised in the district court. In any event, we conclude that Burroughs’s constitutional facial challenge to the “cyber-stalking provision” of Florida’s stalking statute, Fla. Stat. § 784.048, fails based on the particular record in this case and the limited nature of the arguments, on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

647 F. App'x 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louvon-worthern-burroughs-v-angela-corey-ca11-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack