Louvon Worthern Burroughs v. Angela Corey

647 F. App'x 967
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 12, 2016·No. 15-11251·Unpublished·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the district court’s February 18, 2015 order denying plaintiff Louvon Burroughs’s motion for a preliminary injunction and dismissing Burroughs’s first amended complaint with prejudice. We find that Burroughs has likely waived her principal arguments on appeal because they either were not raised in the district court or are materially different from the arguments she raised in the district court. In any event, we conclude that Burroughs’s constitutional facial challenge to the “cyber-stalking provision” of Florida’s stalking statute, Fla. Stat. § 784.048, fails based on the particular record in this case and the limited nature of the arguments, on appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louvon Worthern Burroughs v. Angela Corey, 647 F. App'x 967 (11th Cir. 2016).

647 F. App'x 967 (Louvon Worthern Burroughs v. Angela Corey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cheveon Alonzo Ford v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Mashaud v. Boone
District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2021
Lisa Venn v. Kenneth M. Fowlkes, III
257 So. 3d 622 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)