Lou's Tailoring & Uniform Co. v. Rolle
This text of 184 So. 2d 882 (Lou's Tailoring & Uniform Co. v. Rolle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Our consideration of the record, briefs and arguments leads us to the conclusion that the order of the deputy commissioner , is 'supported by competent substantial evidence and comports with the essential requirements of law. United States Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 55 So.2d 741 (Fla.1951). Its affirmance by the full Industrial Commission is therefore without error. Certiorari is denied.
The attorneys for respondent Nathaniel Rolle are awarded a fee in the amount of three hundred fifrty dollars ($350) for services in this court.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 So. 2d 882, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lous-tailoring-uniform-co-v-rolle-fla-1966.