Lourido v. Commissioner of SS

First Circuit

Lourido v. Commissioner of SS

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedNovember 2, 1999

Docket99-1221

StatusUnpublished

This text of Lourido v. Commissioner of SS (Lourido v. Commissioner of SS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lourido v. Commissioner of SS, (1st Cir. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 99-1221

LUIS LOURIDO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Rivera Esteves on brief for appellant. Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Lilliam Mendoza Toro, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Robert J. Triba, Chief Counsel, Social Security Administration, on brief for appellee.

NOVEMBER 1, 1999

Per Curiam. We affirm the judgment for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. The appellant failed to support his claim of severe impairment with medical evidence concerning the insured period and the decision of the administrative law judge was supported by substantial evidence. See Vazquez Vargas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 838 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1988)(per curiam). Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI