Lourdes M. Garcia v. Dept. Of Homeland Security

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: June 17, 2005
• Docket: 2004-3442
• Status: Published

Opinion

Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

04-3442

LOURDES M. GARCIA,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent.

Katherine A. McDonough, Baptiste & Wilder, P.C., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

Todd M. Hughes, Assistant Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. On the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director; Deborah A. Bynum, Assistant Director; and Steven J. Abelson, Attorney. Of counsel on the brief was Francesca Alvaro, Attorney, Associate Chief Counsel’s Office, United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security, of Miami, Florida.

Appealed from: United States Merit Systems Protection Board United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, MAYER, LOURIE, CLEVENGER, RADER, SCHALL, BRYSON, GAJARSA, LINN, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

This case, having been argued before a panel of three judges on May 6, 2005,

and thereafter having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active

service and a poll having been requested and taken,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The Court sua sponte orders that this case be heard en banc.

The parties are invited to submit additional briefs addressing the following issues:

(1) Whether 5 U.S.C. § 7701 should be construed to incorporate a non-frivolous

allegation standard for establishing the jurisdiction of the Merit Systems

Protection Board.

(2) Whether, if 5 U.S.C. § 7701 is ambiguous as to the standard for jurisdiction, the

Board’s regulation at 5 C.F.R. § 1201.56(a)(2) is entitled to Chevron deference. (3) Whether, if 5 U.S.C. § 7701 incorporates a non-frivolous allegation standard for

establishing the jurisdiction of the Board, it should be construed to also

incorporate a standard that requires a non-frivolous allegation be supported by

some evidence.

This case will be heard en banc on the basis of the briefs already filed and any

additional briefs addressing the issues set forth above. An original and thirty copies of

all additional briefs shall be filed, and two copies served on opposing counsel. Such

additional briefs shall be filed simultaneously by the parties, sixty days from the date of

this Order, and shall not exceed 7,000 words in length.

The Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) is invited to submit an amicus

curiae brief. The brief of the Board also shall be limited to 7,000 words, shall be filed

within sixty days from the date of this Order, and shall comply with Fed. R. App. P. 29

and Federal Circuit Rule 29. Motions for leave to file other amicus curiae briefs may

also be submitted.

Oral argument is scheduled for 10 a.m. on Thursday, October 6, 2005, in

Courtroom 201. Counsel for each side shall have 30 minutes to argue. Counsel for the

Board shall have 20 minutes to argue.

MAYER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

FOR THE COURT

June 17, 2005 s/Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Katherine A. McDonough, Esq. Todd M. Hughes, Esq.

04-3442 2