Lourdes M. Garcia v. Department of Homeland Security

412 F.3d 1330, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11529, 2005 WL 1413800
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2005
Docket04-3442
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 412 F.3d 1330 (Lourdes M. Garcia v. Department of Homeland Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lourdes M. Garcia v. Department of Homeland Security, 412 F.3d 1330, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11529, 2005 WL 1413800 (Fed. Cir. 2005).

Opinion

*1331 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This case, having been argued before a panel of three judges on May 6, 2005, and thereafter having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service and a poll having been requested and taken,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The Court sua sponte orders that this case be heard en banc.

The parties are invited to submit additional briefs addressing the following issues:

(1) Whether 5 U.S.C. § 7701 should be construed to incorporate a non-frivolous allegation standard for establishing the jurisdiction of the Merit Systems Protection Board.
(2) Whether, if 5 U.S.C. § 7701 is ambiguous as to the standard for jurisdiction, the Board’s regulation at 5 C.F.R. § 1201.56(a)(2) is entitled to Chevron deference.
(3) Whether, if 5 U.S.C. § 7701 incorporates a non-frivolous allegation standard for establishing the jurisdiction of the Board, it should be construed to also incorporate a standard that requires a non-frivolous allegation be supported by some evidence.

This case will be heard en banc on the' basis of the briefs already filed and any additional briefs addressing the issues set forth above. An original and thirty copies of all additional briefs shall be filed, and two copies served on opposing counsel. Such additional briefs shall be filed simultaneously by the parties, sixty days from the date of this Order, and shall not exceed 7,000 words in length.

The Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”) is invited to submit an amicus curiae brief. The brief of the Board also shall be limited to 7,000 words, shall be filed within sixty days from the date of this Order, and shall comply with Fed. R.App. P. 29 and Federal Circuit Rule 29. Motions for leave to file other amicus curiae briefs may also be submitted.

Oral argument is scheduled for 10 a.m. on Thursday, October 6, 2005, in Courtroom 201. Counsel for each side shall have 30 minutes to argue. Counsel for the Board shall have 20 minutes to argue.

MAYER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shoaf v. Department of Agriculture
158 F. App'x 267 (Federal Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 F.3d 1330, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11529, 2005 WL 1413800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lourdes-m-garcia-v-department-of-homeland-security-cafc-2005.