Lounsbury v. Ball

12 Wend. 247
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 4, 1834
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 12 Wend. 247 (Lounsbury v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lounsbury v. Ball, 12 Wend. 247 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Opinion

Within the time allowed by the general rules to amend as of course, the plaintiff amended his declaration, which was in ejectment, by stating a different interest from that alleged in the declaration originally served. The defendant moved to set aside the amended narr. on the ground that a declaration in ejectment was in the nature of process, and that process was not amendable as of course.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howe v. Wildes
34 Me. 566 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1852)
Bogart v. M'Donald
2 Johns. Cas. 219 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Wend. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lounsbury-v-ball-nysupct-1834.