Lounsbury v. Ball

New York Supreme Court

Lounsbury v. Ball

12 Wend. 247

New York Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 1834·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Within the time allowed by the general rules to amend as of course, the plaintiff amended his declaration, which was in ejectment, by stating a different interest from that alleged in the declaration originally served. The defendant moved to set aside the amended narr. on the ground that a declaration in ejectment was in the nature of process, and that process was not amendable as of course.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Within the time allowed by the general rules to amend as of course, the plaintiff amended his declaration, which was in ejectment, by stating a different interest from that alleged in the declaration originally served. The defendant moved to set aside the amended narr. on the ground that a declaration in ejectment was in the nature of process, and that process was not amendable as of course.

Motion denied.

Lounsbury v. Ball, 12 Wend. 247 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Pincite

12 Wend. 247 (Lounsbury v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related