Lounsbury v. Ball
This text of 12 Wend. 247 (Lounsbury v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Within the time allowed by the general rules to amend as of course, the plaintiff amended his declaration, which was in ejectment, by stating a different interest from that alleged in the declaration originally served. The defendant moved to set aside the amended narr. on the ground that a declaration in ejectment was in the nature of process, and that process was not amendable as of course.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Wend. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lounsbury-v-ball-nysupct-1834.