Loulis v. Parrott
682 A.2d 1003, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 384
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 18, 1996
DocketSC 15517
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 682 A.2d 1003 (Loulis v. Parrott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Loulis v. Parrott, 682 A.2d 1003, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 384 (Colo. 1996).
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 272 (AC 14890), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Loulis v. Parrott
695 A.2d 1040 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
682 A.2d 1003, 239 Conn. 917, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/loulis-v-parrott-conn-1996.