Louisville & Portland Canal Co. v. Holborn
2 Blackf. 267, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 33
This text of 2 Blackf. 267 (Louisville & Portland Canal Co. v. Holborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Louisville & Portland Canal Co. v. Holborn, 2 Blackf. 267, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 33 (Ind. 1829).
Opinion
A., to whom B. was indebted, levied an attachment on certain goods as B.’s property. C., the owner of the goods, brought an action of replevin against A. and recovered
Replevin lies in such cases as that in the text; and it is no objection to the action that the goods are in the custody of the law. Chinn v. Russell, ante, p. 172, and note (3).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Butler v. Borders
6 Blackf. 160 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1842)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Blackf. 267, 1829 Ind. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-portland-canal-co-v-holborn-ind-1829.