Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Murdock
This text of 82 Ind. 381 (Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellees vigorously maintain that we can not consider any of the questions discussed by appellant, for the reason that it does not affirmatively appear that all of the evidence is in the record. It is true that the evidence is not shown to be all in the bill, and it is also true that the case can not be fully considered, or properly decided, without an examination of the entire evidence, and the contention of appellees must, therefore, prevail.
Judgment affirmed.
Petition for a rehearing overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 Ind. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-new-albany-chicago-railway-co-v-murdock-ind-1882.