Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Head
This text of 71 Ind. 176 (Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case there are two papers, one at the commencement and one at the conclusion of the tran[177]*177script, purporting to be assignments of error, but neither of them sets forth the names of the parties at all, as required by Rule 1 of this court. Eor this reason, the appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion must be sustained. The State, ex rel. Childers, v. Delano, 84 Ind. 52.
The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Ind. 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-new-albany-chicago-railway-co-v-head-ind-1880.