Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Head
71 Ind. 176
Opinion
In this case there are two papers, one at the commencement and one at the conclusion of the tran[177]*177script, purporting to be assignments of error, but neither of them sets forth the names of the parties at all, as required by Rule 1 of this court. Eor this reason, the appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion must be sustained. The State, ex rel. Childers, v. Delano, 84 Ind. 52.
The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Head, 71 Ind. 176 (Ind. 1880).
71 Ind. 176 (Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Head) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of South Bend v. Thompson
49 N.E. 38 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Estate of Thomas v. Service
90 Ind. 128 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Thoma v. State
86 Ind. 182 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)