Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Coyle

85 Ind. 516
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1882
DocketNo. 10,547
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 85 Ind. 516 (Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Coyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Coyle, 85 Ind. 516 (Ind. 1882).

Opinion

Elliott, J.

The appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be sustained.

The action originated before a justice of the peace; the appellee’s judgment, exclusive of interest, is for $50, and she is content with her judgment. The adjudged cases settle these propositions:

1st. Where the plaintiff recovers $50, or less, and is satisfied with the amount of the recovery, and the defendant is [517]*517merely resisting the recovery, and is claiming no set-off or counter-claim, then the amount so recovered is all that is in controversy. Sprinkle v. Toney, 73 Ind. 592; Parsley v. Eskew, 73 Ind. 558; Pennsylvania Co. v. Trimble, 75 Ind. 378.

• 2d. In order to give this court jurisdiction in cases originating before justices of the peace, the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, must exceed $50. Wagner v. Kastner, 79 Ind. 162; Breidert v. Krueger, 76 Ind. 55; PLalleclc v. Weller, 72 Ind. 342.

It is very obvious that what is said in Breidert v. Krueger, supra, as to the statement in the body of the complaint controlling instead of the sum laid in the conclusion, has not the remotest application to such a case as the present.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colliery Engineer Co. v. American Car & Foundry Co.
60 N.E. 941 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
Duckworth v. Mosier
30 N.E. 936 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)
Ex parte Sweeney
27 N.E. 127 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Bosworth v. Wayne Pike Co.
101 Ind. 175 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Winship v. Block
96 Ind. 446 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 Ind. 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-new-albany-chicago-railway-co-v-coyle-ind-1882.