Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Beck

21 N.E. 471, 119 Ind. 124, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 245
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 1889·No. No. 13,424·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Mitchell, J. —

This action was brought against the appellant railroad company by Beck, the owner of a lot in the city of Delphi, to recover so much of the lot as is occupied by the railroad company with its track and right of way, over and upon which it is conducting its business as a common carrier.

This case is directly within the principles which ruled in Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Soltweddle, 116 Ind. 257, Bravard v. Cincinnati, etc., R. R. Co., 115 Ind. 1, Sherlock v. Louisville, etc., R. W. Co., 115 Ind. 22 (30), Midland R. W. Co. v. Smith, 113 Ind. 233, Indiana, etc., R. W. Co. v. Allen, 113 Ind. 581, and other cases.

[125]*125Filed May 17, 1889.

These cases declare the general rule, that a land-owner who stands by, without demanding compensation, until a railroad company has so far completed and put in operation its road over his land as to involve the public interest, can neither enjoin the company nor maintain ejectment to recover his land. The only remedy left to the land-owner, in such a case, is to proceed within the proper time to have* his damages assessed and enforced against the railroad company. This rule is founded upon the general principles of public policy, as well as upon the provisions of section 3953, R. S. 1881.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Beck, 21 N.E. 471, 119 Ind. 124, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 245 (Ind. 1889).

21 N.E. 471 (Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Mann
1920 OK 293 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Victoria Copper Mining Co. v. Rich
193 F. 314 (Sixth Circuit, 1911)
Dalton v. Katalla Co.
4 Alaska 410 (D. Alaska, 1911)
McClarren v. Jefferson School Township
82 N.E. 73 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1907)
Busenbark v. Clements
53 N.E. 665 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Huffman v. State
52 N.E. 713 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Englehart
77 N.W. 1092 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. Hughes
30 S.E. 972 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Berkey
36 N.E. 642 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. Hall
34 N.E. 704 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Morgan v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
28 N.E. 548 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Porter v. Midland Railway Co.
25 N.E. 556 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Strickler v. Midland Railway Co.
25 N.E. 455 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Midland Railway Co. v. Smith
25 N.E. 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Kincaid v. Indianapolis Natural Gas Co.
8 L.R.A. 602 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)