Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Beck
This text of 21 N.E. 471 (Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought against the appellant railroad company by Beck, the owner of a lot in the city of Delphi, to recover so much of the lot as is occupied by the railroad company with its track and right of way, over and upon which it is conducting its business as a common carrier.
This case is directly within the principles which ruled in Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Soltweddle, 116 Ind. 257, Bravard v. Cincinnati, etc., R. R. Co., 115 Ind. 1, Sherlock v. Louisville, etc., R. W. Co., 115 Ind. 22 (30), Midland R. W. Co. v. Smith, 113 Ind. 233, Indiana, etc., R. W. Co. v. Allen, 113 Ind. 581, and other cases.
These cases declare the general rule, that a land-owner who stands by, without demanding compensation, until a railroad company has so far completed and put in operation its road over his land as to involve the public interest, can neither enjoin the company nor maintain ejectment to recover his land. The only remedy left to the land-owner, in such a case, is to proceed within the proper time to have* his damages assessed and enforced against the railroad company. This rule is founded upon the general principles of public policy, as well as upon the provisions of section 3953, R. S. 1881.
The judgment is reversed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 N.E. 471, 119 Ind. 124, 1889 Ind. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-new-albany-chicago-railway-co-v-beck-ind-1889.