Louisville National Banking Co. v. Pfaffinger

159 F. 1027
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 1908
DocketNo. 1,729
StatusPublished

This text of 159 F. 1027 (Louisville National Banking Co. v. Pfaffinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville National Banking Co. v. Pfaffinger, 159 F. 1027 (6th Cir. 1908).

Opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Kentucky. Wm. M. Smith, for appellant. Joseph E. Conkling, for appellee. No opinion. Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See 154 Fed. 523.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 F. 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-national-banking-co-v-pfaffinger-ca6-1908.