Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Scott
219 U.S. 209, 31 S. Ct. 171, 55 L. Ed. 183, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1631
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case was heard with No. 215, Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Riverside Mills, just decided. Like that case it presents only the question of the constitutionality of the Carmack amendment of the act to regulate commerce.
The facts are not substantially different, and the judgment of the Court of'Appeals of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is affirmed upon the authority of that case.
Ajjirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Scott, 219 U.S. 209, 31 S. Ct. 171, 55 L. Ed. 183, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1631 (1911).
219 U.S. 209 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harrison v. Herzig Building & Supply Co.
161 S.W.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1942)
Knight v. Pennsylvania R. R.
132 S.W.2d 950 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)
Cantor v. Pennsylvania Railroad
150 Misc. 844 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)
Pestereff v. Reed
7 Alaska 644 (D. Alaska, 1927)
St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Morris
248 S.W. 57 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Parham v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.
189 P. 227 (Montana Supreme Court, 1920)
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Truitt Co.
86 S.E. 421 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly's Administratrix
171 S.W. 185 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1914)
Hogan Milling Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad
139 P. 397 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)