Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Newman

57 S.E. 515, 128 Ga. 283, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 85
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 S.E. 515 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Newman, 57 S.E. 515, 128 Ga. 283, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 85 (Ga. 1907).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

This was a suit against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, a foreign corporation, and the Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Company, a corporation of this State. The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company tiled an application to remove the case to the Federal court, upon the ground of diverse citizenship. This application was refused, and the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company excepted. When a resident and a non-resident are sued in the State court upon a joint cause of action, the case is not removable to the Federal court. Southern Railway Co. v. Grizzle, 124 Ga. 741. If the cause of action is not joint, but the resident is a necessary party to the determination of the controversy between the plaintiff and the nonresident, the case is not removable. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Griffith, 104 Ga. 56 (2); Withers v. Hopkins Savings Bank, Id. 89; Paulk v. Ensign-Oskamp Co., 123 Ga. 467. If the case is separable into parts, so that in one of the parts a controversy will be presented wholly between citizens of different States, which can bo fully determined without the presence of the other parties to the suit, the case is removable at the instance of the non-resident defendant. Foster’s Fed. Pr. §384. That is, if the petition sets forth two separate controversies, one against the non-resident defendant, and the other against the resident defendant, and the one against the non-resident defendant can be wholly determined withr out reference to the rights of the resident defendant, the case is removable. It would seem, for a stronger reason, that if the plaintiff has set forth a cause of action against the non-resident defendant, but has joined in the suit a resident defendant against whom he fails to set forth any cause of action whatever, the case would also be removable. It h^s been judicially determined that the petition in the present case sets forth no cause of action what[285]*285ever against the resident defendant, either as a joint wrong-doer with the non-resident defendant or otherwise. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Ry. Co. v. Newman, ante, 281. The judge erred in refusing to grant the order for the removal of the case.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. Sterrett
51 Colo. 17 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1911)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Newman
64 S.E. 541 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 S.E. 515, 128 Ga. 283, 1907 Ga. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-newman-ga-1907.