Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Nanny

73 S.E. 1052, 137 Ga. 607, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 1052 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Nanny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Nanny, 73 S.E. 1052, 137 Ga. 607, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 105 (Ga. 1912).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. A landlord can not recover in a suit for damages against a railroad company for failure to keep in good repair a Stock-guard, where the sole damage alleged is to the crop of a tenant.

2. The right of action given by the Civil Code, §§ 2699 et seq., is a statutory right, and applies only to the owner of the land, and not to a tenant. Florida etc. R. Co. v. Judge, 100 Ga. 600 (28 S. E. 379); Hardin v. Chattanooga Southern R. Co., 113 Ga. 357 (38 S. E. 839); Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Fowler, 104 Ga. 148 (30 S. E. 243); Southern R. Co. v. Harrell, 104 Ga. 602 (30 S. E. 821).

3. Under the principles above announced, and the former decisions of this court, the action was subject to general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Bill, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Judge
28 S.E. 379 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Alabama Great Southern R. R. v. Fowler
30 S.E. 243 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Southern Railway Co. v. Harrell
30 S.E. 821 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Hardin v. Chattanooga Southern Railroad
38 S.E. 839 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 1052, 137 Ga. 607, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-nanny-ga-1912.