Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell

64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 390, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 312
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 29, 1909
Docket1837
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 1134 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell, 64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 390, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 312 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Rowell, J.

It appears that the summons was served upon one who was chief clerk in the Atlanta offices of the defendant corporation. Held, although it appears that there was another person who was superior in rank to the one upon whom service was made, and who bore the official designation of “agent,” the service was nevertheless good, under the Civil Code, §1899. Southern Bell Tel. Co. v. Parker, 119 Ga. 721 (47 S. E. 194). This ruling renders it unnecessary to consider the other assignments of error presented in the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Power & Light Co. v. Wilson
173 S.E. 220 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Ellis
87 S.E. 815 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Central Georgia Power Co. v. Parnell
76 S.E. 157 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 390, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-mitchell-gactapp-1909.