Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell

64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 390, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 312
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 29, 1909·No. 1837·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Rowell, J.

It appears that the summons was served upon one who was chief clerk in the Atlanta offices of the defendant corporation. Held, although it appears that there was another person who was superior in rank to the one upon whom service was made, and who bore the official designation of “agent,” the service was nevertheless good, under the Civil Code, §1899. Southern Bell Tel. Co. v. Parker, 119 Ga. 721 (47 S. E. 194). This ruling renders it unnecessary to consider the other assignments of error presented in the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell, 64 S.E. 1134, 6 Ga. App. 390, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 312 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

64 S.E. 1134 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Georgia Power & Light Co. v. Wilson
173 S.E. 220 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Ellis
87 S.E. 815 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Central Georgia Power Co. v. Parnell
76 S.E. 157 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)