Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mayes

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mayes

95 S.E. 371, 22 Ga. App. 97, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 170
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1918
Docket8980
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 371 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mayes, 95 S.E. 371, 22 Ga. App. 97, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 170 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodwortii, J.

While we are reluctant to interfere with a verdict approved by the presiding judge, yet in this ease the evidence as it conies to us does not show any negligence on the part of the railroad company, and the judgment of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial is Reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 371, 22 Ga. App. 97, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-mayes-gactapp-1918.