Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnson

135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 108, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 798

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 9, 1926

Docket17563

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 496 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnson, 135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 108, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 798 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The verdict for damages' against the railroad company, for ejecting the plaintiff from a passenger-train while he was within his rights as a passenger, was not without evidence to support it; and for no reason pointed out by special assignment of error did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed..

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The verdict for damages' against the railroad company, for ejecting the plaintiff from a passenger-train while he was within his rights as a passenger, was not without evidence to support it; and for no reason pointed out by special assignment of error did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed..

Broyles, C. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E. 496, 36 Ga. App. 108, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-johnson-gactapp-1926.