Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hood
This text of 102 S.E. 133 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the Federal “employer’s liability act” (U. S. Comp. St. §§ S657-8665), an employee of a railroad company, except in cases involving violation by the carrier of the statute enacted for the safety of employees, assumes the ordinary risks and hazards of his particular employment, and also those defects and risks which are known to him, or which are plainly observable, although due to the master’s negligence. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co. v. Sylvester, 17 Ga. App. 85 (86 S. E. 275), and cit.
2. Under the above ruling- and the facts' of the instant case a recovery by the plaintiff was unauthorized, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.
3. In view of the above holding it is unnecessary to pass upon the special assignments of error.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E. 133, 24 Ga. App. 769, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-hood-gactapp-1920.