Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Gilbert
This text of 86 S.E. 217 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. While the evidence in this case is meager, yet in view of the rule that the jury may, draw reasonable inferences from facts proved, and inasmuch as the presiding judge in the exercise of his discretion refused to grant a new trial, this court will not reverse the judgment on the ground that the verdict was without evidence to support it.
2. The newly discovered evidence was not of such character as to render a refusal to grant a new trial based upon it erroneous.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 S.E. 217, 144 Ga. 89, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-gilbert-ga-1915.