Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Gaston

216 U.S. 418, 30 S. Ct. 291, 54 L. Ed. 542, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1907
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 21, 1910
Docket451, 466; 466
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 216 U.S. 418 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Gaston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Gaston, 216 U.S. 418, 30 S. Ct. 291, 54 L. Ed. 542, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1907 (1910).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Day

delivered the opinion of the court.

No. 451 was argued and submitted with Southern Railway Co. v. Greene, No. 450, just decided. Nos. 451 and 466 were argued at the same time in the Supremo Court of Alabama with the case of Southern Railway Co. v. Greene, No. 450, and wore decided on .the authority of that case. That court said (49 So. Rep. 412): “These cases [Nos. 450, 451 and 466] wern argued, submitted and considered together, and the points raised by the pleadings in each case are, for convenience, treated of and embodied in one opinion,” referring to. the opinion in the Greene ease. '

These cases are embraced within the opinion in the Greene ' case in this court. For the reasons stated in that case-both of these cases arc -reversed, and remanded to the Supreme Court of Alabama for further proceedings consistent with that opinion.

Mr. Justice Lurton was not on the bench when Nos. 450 and 451 were argued and submitted. No. 466 was submitted after he took his seat on the bench, and 1 am permitted to say, for the *420 reasons stated in the opinion in No. 450, Southern Railway Co. v. Greene, he-concurs in the judgment in No. 4(30.

Reversed.

Dissenting:'The Chief Justice, Mn. Justice McKenna and Mr. Justice Holmes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Woodmen Accident Co. v. Conn
156 N.E. 114 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)
Parchman v. Mobile O.R.R. Co.
109 So. 665 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1926)
S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co. v. Commonwealth
98 N.E. 1056 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 U.S. 418, 30 S. Ct. 291, 54 L. Ed. 542, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-gaston-scotus-1910.