Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Andrews

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Andrews

73 S.E. 549, 10 Ga. App. 349, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 503

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1912

Docket3516

StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 549 (Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Andrews, 73 S.E. 549, 10 Ga. App. 349, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 503 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The exceptions taken to excerpts from the charge are supported by verbal inaccuracies, but there were no substantial or misleading errors; and the instructions, taken as a whole, fairly and clearly presented the issues.

2. There was conflict in the evidence, both as to the negligence alleged and the damages claimed. These conflicts were settled by the verdict; and as no error of law of a prejudicial character appears, no reason is shown for the grant of another trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. The exceptions taken to excerpts from the charge are supported by verbal inaccuracies, but there were no substantial or misleading errors; and the instructions, taken as a whole, fairly and clearly presented the issues.

2. There was conflict in the evidence, both as to the negligence alleged and the damages claimed. These conflicts were settled by the verdict; and as no error of law of a prejudicial character appears, no reason is shown for the grant of another trial. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 S.E. 549, 10 Ga. App. 349, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-railroad-v-andrews-gactapp-1912.