Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Commonwealth

152 S.W. 976, 151 Ky. 774, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 586
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Commonwealth. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Ky. 459
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided January 28, 1913·Published

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Modifying former opinion.

In our former opinion we remanded this cause with directions to escheat lot No. 9., L. &. N. R. R. Co. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, by et al, 151 Ky., 325. Upon a consideration of that part of the opinion, we conclude, in view of the peculiar facts of this case, that the parties should he given another opportunity to take proof in regard to lot No. 9. Wherefore, that part of the opinion escheating lot No. 9 is withdrawn, and the opinion modified as herein indicated.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Whole court sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Commonwealth, 152 S.W. 976, 151 Ky. 774, 1913 Ky. LEXIS 586 (Ky. Ct. App. 1913).

152 S.W. 976 (Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Commonwealth
151 S.W. 934 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)