Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Clark
This text of 4 Ky. Op. 294 (Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
The instructions to the jury, though somewhat' plethoric are yet substantially as favorable to the appellant as it could reasonably ask.
And, while the onus was on the appellant, it offered no evidence to show how the mule was killed or why. The jury had a right therefore to infer from the facts proved' by the appellee that ordinary care might have avoided the accident of running over the mule.
We cannot say that the verdict was either unauthorized or exorbitant.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ky. Op. 294, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-r-r-co-v-clark-kyctapp-1871.