Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Frizzle

109 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 682
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 1926·No. 3 Div. 538.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

So far as we can see, the questions of law raised on this appeal are the same as those raised and decided adversely to appellant in the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Cecil Frizzle, 108 So. 615, 1 ,and the holdings therein having been reviewed and approved by the .Supreme Court of this State (108 So. 616), the judgment here appealed from is affirmed, on the authority of the opinion in that case. Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 354.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Frizzle, 109 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

109 So. 925 (Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Frizzle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wix v. State
108 So. 616 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle
108 So. 615 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)