Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Frizzle

Alabama Court of Appeals

Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Frizzle

109 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 682

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 1926

Docket3 Div. 538.

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 925 (Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Frizzle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Frizzle, 109 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 682 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

So far as we can see, the questions of law raised on this appeal are the same as those raised and decided adversely to appellant in the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Cecil Frizzle, 108 So. 615, 1 ,and the holdings therein having been reviewed and approved by the .Supreme Court of this State (108 So. 616), the judgment here appealed from is affirmed, on the authority of the opinion in that case. Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 354.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

So far as we can see, the questions of law raised on this appeal are the same as those raised and decided adversely to appellant in the case of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Cecil Frizzle, 108 So. 615, 1 ,and the holdings therein having been reviewed and approved by the .Supreme Court of this State (108 So. 616), the judgment here appealed from is affirmed, on the authority of the opinion in that case. Affirmed.

1

Ante, p. 354.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 925, 21 Ala. App. 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-r-co-v-frizzle-alactapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack