Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Copeland

117 So. 176, 217 Ala. 556, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 74
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 17, 1928
Docket8 Div. 17.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 So. 176 (Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Copeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville Nashville R. Co. v. Copeland, 117 So. 176, 217 Ala. 556, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 74 (Ala. 1928).

Opinion

THOMAS, J.

This cause is affirmed conditionally on the authority of L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Crick, ante, p. 547, 117 So. 167.

If, within 30 days, plaintiff enters a remittitur of $400, on the records of this court, the judgment for the balance of $600, with interest from date of judgment in the court below (but without the statutory penalty of 10 per centum), will be affirmed. .Otherwise, the verdict and judgment will be set aside, and the cause remanded for another trial.

Affirmed conditionally.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Southern Railway Co.
36 S.W.2d 20 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 So. 176, 217 Ala. 556, 1928 Ala. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-nashville-r-co-v-copeland-ala-1928.