Louisville & N. R. v. Irwin
209 F. 614, 126 C.C.A. 608, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1832
This text of 209 F. 614 (Louisville & N. R. v. Irwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Louisville & N. R. v. Irwin, 209 F. 614, 126 C.C.A. 608, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1832 (5th Cir. 1913).
Opinion
The speed ordinance of the town of Bay Minette was admissible in evidence under the counts in the complaint which charged that the engineer at the time of the accident was wantonly and recklessly running his engine over a crossing at a high rate of speed.
In other rulings of the court we find no reversible error,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
209 F. 614, 126 C.C.A. 608, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-n-r-v-irwin-ca5-1913.