Louisville N. R. Co. v. Langston
112 So. 917, 216 Ala. 693
This text of 112 So. 917 (Louisville N. R. Co. v. Langston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Louisville N. R. Co. v. Langston, 112 So. 917, 216 Ala. 693 (Ala. 1927).
Opinion
The question whether the workman in this case was totally disabled by the accident he suffered was a question of fact, as to which there was some conflict in the evidence. Such questions are not reviewable. The court here finds that the decree was substantially correct and will order an affirmance. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 So. 917, 216 Ala. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-n-r-co-v-langston-ala-1927.