Louisville N. R. Co. v. Holmes

89 So. 610, 206 Ala. 304, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 124
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 30, 1921·No. 8 Div. 343.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The decisions in Missouri Pacific R. Co. et al. v. Ault (No. 252, June 1, 1921), 256 U. S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 593, 65 L. Ed. -, and Charlton v. A. G. S., 89 South. 710, 1 demonstrate that appellant had a complete and adequate remedy at law.

The decree of the circuit court, in equity, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN. SAYRE, SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.
1

Post, p. 341.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Holmes, 89 So. 610, 206 Ala. 304, 1921 Ala. LEXIS 124 (Ala. 1921).

89 So. 610 (Louisville N. R. Co. v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Finnell v. Pitts
132 So. 2 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Davis v. Dawkins
95 So. 188 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Charlton v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.
89 So. 710 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)