Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Harkness

97 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 687
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 16, 1923
Docket6 Div. 237.
StatusPublished

This text of 97 So. 924 (Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Harkness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Harkness, 97 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 687 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The affirmative charge for defendant, was properly refused; L. & N. R. Co. v. Marbury Lumber Co., 125 Ala. 254, 28 South. 438, 50 L. R. A. 620; A. G. S. R. Co. v. Moody, 90 Ala. 46, 8 South. 57; Roman v. Lentz, 177 Ala. 64, 58 South. 438. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. Moody
90 Ala. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.
125 Ala. 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Roman v. Lentz
58 So. 438 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 So. 924, 19 Ala. App. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-n-r-co-v-harkness-alactapp-1923.