Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Frizzle

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Frizzle

108 So. 616, 214 Ala. 688, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 136
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 20, 1926
Docket3 Div. 759.
StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 616 (Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Frizzle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Frizzle, 108 So. 616, 214 Ala. 688, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 136 (Ala. 1926).

Opinion

BOULDIN, J.

Petition of the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Frizzle, 108 So. 615.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, O. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle
108 So. 615 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 So. 616, 214 Ala. 688, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisville-n-r-co-v-frizzle-ala-1926.