Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Surwald

Appellate Court of Illinois

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Surwald

34 Ill. App. 525, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 293

DecidedFebruary 4, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 34 Ill. App. 525 (Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Surwald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railroad v. Surwald, 34 Ill. App. 525, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 293 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Phillips, J.

The appellant not being a party to the record, if it desired to be let in to defend, it should have personally made application therefor. T. W. & W. Ry. Co. v. Beggs, 85 Ill. 80; The Mercantile Insurance Co. v. Jaynes et al., 87 Ill. 199; Lawrence v. Lane, 4 Gilm. 354.

The suggestion of the solicitors of defendants to the petition did not make appellant a party. Mercantile Insurance Co. v. Jaynes et al., supra.

Rot being a party to the proceedings the right of appeal did not exist.

The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI