Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy

35 S.E. 632, 111 Ga. 827, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 769
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 11, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. A judgment overruling a demurrer to an answer, unless excepted to and reversed, concludes the plaintiff as to the legal sufficiency of theanswer; andif the samegoes to the wholeof the plaintiff’s demand and is duly supported by evidence, a complete defense is established.

2. Applying this rule to the evidence appearing in the record, the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

3. No material error of law was committed by the court below, and the newly discovered evidence presents no cause for a neiy trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy, 35 S.E. 632, 111 Ga. 827, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 769 (Ga. 1900).

35 S.E. 632 (Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. Lumsden
44 S.E.2d 231 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Perry v. Perry
4 S.E.2d 184 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Piedmont Hospital v. Truitt
172 S.E. 237 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Kiser Co. v. McLean, Everett & Co.
58 S.E. 489 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)