Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy

Supreme Court of Georgia

Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy

35 S.E. 632, 111 Ga. 827, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 769

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 11, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 S.E. 632 (Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisville Coffin Co. v. Rhudy, 35 S.E. 632, 111 Ga. 827, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 769 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. A judgment overruling a demurrer to an answer, unless excepted to and reversed, concludes the plaintiff as to the legal sufficiency of theanswer; andif the samegoes to the wholeof the plaintiff’s demand and is duly supported by evidence, a complete defense is established.

2. Applying this rule to the evidence appearing in the record, the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

3. No material error of law was committed by the court below, and the newly discovered evidence presents no cause for a neiy trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI