Louisville & Atlantic Railroad v. Phillips

145 S.W. 1105, 148 Ky. 49, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 371
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided April 25, 1912·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson—

Sustaining Motion.

No form of bill of exception is required. (Civil Code, section 335.) A copy of the stenographer’s transcript approved by the court and filed for the purposes of an appeal by an order of court will be treated as a bill of exceptions when it contains all that is necessary in a bill of exceptions and it was intended as bill of except tions when filed by the circuit court. (Postal Telegraph Co. v. Louisville Cotton Oil Co., 137 Ky., 843.)

The motion to file the additional record is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisville & Atlantic Railroad v. Phillips, 145 S.W. 1105, 148 Ky. 49, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 371 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

145 S.W. 1105 (Louisville & Atlantic Railroad v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McFall v. Burley Tobacco Growers Cooperative Ass'n
113 S.W.2d 425 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1938)
Nuckolls v. Illinois Central Railroad
14 S.W.2d 157 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
Combs v. Commonwealth
13 S.W.2d 788 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stewart's Administrator
269 S.W. 555 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1925)
Miller v. Commonwealth
194 S.W. 320 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1917)