Louison v. West Haven Buckle, No. Cv 91-0323965-S (Mar. 19, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2202
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 19, 1996·No. No. CV 91-0323965-S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT CT Page 2203 The defendant asks the court to set aside the judgment in that the court did not properly weigh the testimony of George A. Everson. Everson had testified as to the lost profits for the defendant. "It is the privilege of the trier to adopt whatever testimony he reasonably believes to be credible." Grote v. A. C.Hine Co., 148 Conn. 283, 287. "The trial court is the judge of the credibility of witnesses. That a fact was testified to does not make it an admitted or undisputed fact." Yale University v.New Haven, 169 Conn. 454, 463. "Evidence of past profits is admissible upon an inquiry as to prospective, but not, of course, conclusive." Maquire v. Kiesel, 86 Conn. 453, 461.

The motion is denied.

Burns, J. [EDITORS' NOTE: THE CASE THAT PREVIOUSLY APPEARED ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN MOVED TO CONN. SUP. PUBLISHED OPINIONS.] CT Page 2209

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louison v. West Haven Buckle, No. Cv 91-0323965-S (Mar. 19, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2202 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2202 (Louison v. West Haven Buckle, No. Cv 91-0323965-S (Mar. 19, 1996)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grote v. A. C. Hine Co.
170 A.2d 138 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1961)
Yale University v. City of New Haven
363 A.2d 1108 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1975)
Maguire v. Kiesel
85 A. 689 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1913)