Louison v. West Haven Buckle, No. Cv 91-0323965-S (Mar. 19, 1996)

Connecticut Superior Court

Louison v. West Haven Buckle, No. Cv 91-0323965-S (Mar. 19, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2202

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedMarch 19, 1996

DocketNo. CV 91-0323965-S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2202 (Louison v. West Haven Buckle, No. Cv 91-0323965-S (Mar. 19, 1996)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louison v. West Haven Buckle, No. Cv 91-0323965-S (Mar. 19, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2202 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT CT Page 2203 The defendant asks the court to set aside the judgment in that the court did not properly weigh the testimony of George A. Everson. Everson had testified as to the lost profits for the defendant. "It is the privilege of the trier to adopt whatever testimony he reasonably believes to be credible." Grote v. A. C.Hine Co., 148 Conn. 283, 287. "The trial court is the judge of the credibility of witnesses. That a fact was testified to does not make it an admitted or undisputed fact." Yale University v.New Haven, 169 Conn. 454, 463. "Evidence of past profits is admissible upon an inquiry as to prospective, but not, of course, conclusive." Maquire v. Kiesel, 86 Conn. 453, 461.

The motion is denied.

Burns, J. [EDITORS' NOTE: THE CASE THAT PREVIOUSLY APPEARED ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN MOVED TO CONN. SUP. PUBLISHED OPINIONS.] CT Page 2209

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT CT Page 2203 The defendant asks the court to set aside the judgment in that the court did not properly weigh the testimony of George A. Everson. Everson had testified as to the lost profits for the defendant. "It is the privilege of the trier to adopt whatever testimony he reasonably believes to be credible." Grote v. A. C.Hine Co., 148 Conn. 283, 287. "The trial court is the judge of the credibility of witnesses. That a fact was testified to does not make it an admitted or undisputed fact." Yale University v.New Haven, 169 Conn. 454, 463. "Evidence of past profits is admissible upon an inquiry as to prospective, but not, of course, conclusive." Maquire v. Kiesel, 86 Conn. 453, 461.

The motion is denied.

Burns, J. [EDITORS' NOTE: THE CASE THAT PREVIOUSLY APPEARED ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN MOVED TO CONN. SUP. PUBLISHED OPINIONS.] CT Page 2209

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 2202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louison-v-west-haven-buckle-no-cv-91-0323965-s-mar-19-1996-connsuperct-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack