Louisiana State Bar Association v. Van Buskirk

191 So. 2d 497, 249 La. 781, 1966 La. LEXIS 2136
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 7, 1966
Docket47464
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 191 So. 2d 497 (Louisiana State Bar Association v. Van Buskirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Van Buskirk, 191 So. 2d 497, 249 La. 781, 1966 La. LEXIS 2136 (La. 1966).

Opinion

SANDERS, Justice.

The Louisiana State Bar Association instituted this disbarment proceeding against Richard G. Van Buslcirk, an attorney practicing in this state. The petition sets forth seven charges of professional misconduct.

The Commissioner appointed by this Court found the evidence substantiated these charges and recommended disbarment of the respondent attorney. The respondent has taken no exception to the Commissioner’s findings, but does urge leniency.

Two instances of misusing client-funds represent the major derelictions in respondent’s professional conduct.

On or about November 16, 1961, respondent accepted employment with a Texas law firm to collect a promissory note. *783 Respondent collected approximately six hundred dollars from the debtor in settlement of the note. Despite demand from the forwarding attorneys, respondent failed to remit the sum collected and had not done so at the time of the Commissioner’s hearing in this matter on November 19, 1965.

During 1962, U. U. Rushing & Son retained respondent to collect an overdue account. Following collection, respondent sent the client his check for $269.74, which the bank refused to honor because of insufficient funds on deposit. As of the date of the Commissioner’s hearing in this proceeding, respondent had not yet accounted to his client.

Because of their professional status, attorneys must adhere to a high standard of conduct in relations with their clients. The conversion of a client’s funds is one of the most serious violations of an attorney’s obligations. For the protection of the courts and the public, we have concluded respondent must be disbarred.

For the reasons assigned, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the name of Richard G. Van Buskirk, respondent herein, be stricken from the roll of attorneys and his license to practice law in Louisiana is hereby cancelled. All costs of this proceeding are assessed against the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Sonnier (In Re Sonnier)
157 B.R. 976 (E.D. Louisiana, 1993)
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Perez
471 So. 2d 685 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Cryer
441 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASS'N v. Atkins
440 So. 2d 106 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1983)
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Mundy
423 So. 2d 1126 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1982)
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Jordan
375 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1979)
Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Adams
368 So. 2d 694 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1979)
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Weysham
307 So. 2d 336 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1975)
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Levy
292 So. 2d 492 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1974)
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Selenberg
270 So. 2d 848 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Jacques
257 So. 2d 413 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
Louisiana State Bar Association v. Klein
218 So. 2d 610 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 2d 497, 249 La. 781, 1966 La. LEXIS 2136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisiana-state-bar-association-v-van-buskirk-la-1966.