Louisiana State Bank v. Fuselier

9 Rob. 26
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Rob. 26 (Louisiana State Bank v. Fuselier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Louisiana State Bank v. Fuselier, 9 Rob. 26 (La. 1844).

Opinion

Bullard, J,

This is an action against Alcide Fuselier, as drawer, and P. P., Briant as endorser of a promissory note; and the bank is appellant from a judgment in favor of the drawer. His defence was that he signed the note as agent of his brother Jules G. Fuselier, and that he endorsed it, but that, out of his presence, and without his consent, the words “for Jules Fuselier,” following his own name, were erased, and his name stricken out as endorser.

The evidence fully sustains this defence. The cashier was directed by the board of directors to make the alteration, they not being satisfied that the appellee was authorized by his brother to make the note. That was a good reason for not discounting it, but by no means authorized the directors to mutilate the note, and to bind the appellee as drawer, without his knowledge or consent,

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matthews v. Rudy
4 La. App. 226 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Rob. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisiana-state-bank-v-fuselier-la-1844.