Louisiana Petroleum Co. v. Lemle & Crandall

Fifth Circuit

Louisiana Petroleum Co. v. Lemle & Crandall

175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 666, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4211

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 1, 1910

DocketNo. 1,927

StatusPublished

This text of 175 F. 1021 (Louisiana Petroleum Co. v. Lemle & Crandall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louisiana Petroleum Co. v. Lemle & Crandall, 175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 666, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4211 (5th Cir. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The special master, who heard the witnesses and took the evidence, in a carefully prepared and elaborate report found against tbe appellant. On exceptions, the Circuit Court, on due consideration, after hearing argument, reduced the master’s finding, in certain respects, and also found against the appellant. On this appeal we have given the assignments of error full consideration, and reached the conclusion that the decree of the Circuit Court can only be reversed by finding that the manner and methods of delivering oil by the Lone Star & Crescent Company from its tanks, pipes, arid., [1022]*1022vessels were so faulty, uncertain, and careless that no effect should be given to the measurements made at the time of delivery of oil to the Louisiana Petroleum Company; and such finding is not warranted under the evidence as we read it. The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The special master, who heard the witnesses and took the evidence, in a carefully prepared and elaborate report found against tbe appellant. On exceptions, the Circuit Court, on due consideration, after hearing argument, reduced the master’s finding, in certain respects, and also found against the appellant. On this appeal we have given the assignments of error full consideration, and reached the conclusion that the decree of the Circuit Court can only be reversed by finding that the manner and methods of delivering oil by the Lone Star & Crescent Company from its tanks, pipes, arid., [1022]*1022vessels were so faulty, uncertain, and careless that no effect should be given to the measurements made at the time of delivery of oil to the Louisiana Petroleum Company; and such finding is not warranted under the evidence as we read it. The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 F. 1021, 99 C.C.A. 666, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louisiana-petroleum-co-v-lemle-crandall-ca5-1910.