Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. Deano

856 So. 2d 165, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 143, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 2671, 2003 WL 22240605
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided October 1, 2003·No. No. 03-143·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COOKS, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Deano v. Akkaraju, 03-142 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/1/03), 856 So.2d 155, we affirm the judgment of the trial court sustaining the exception of no cause of action and dismissing the petition for declaratory judgment. All costs of this proceeding are assessed against appellant, the Louisiana Patients’ Compensation Fund Oversight Board.

AFFIRMED.

AMY, J, dissents for the reasons assigned in the companion case of Deano v. Akkaraju, 03-142 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/1/03); 856 So.2d 155.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. Deano, 856 So. 2d 165, 3 La.App. 3 Cir. 143, 2003 La. App. LEXIS 2671, 2003 WL 22240605 (La. Ct. App. 2003).

856 So. 2d 165 (Louisiana Patients' Compensation Fund Oversight Board v. Deano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deano v. Akkaraju
856 So. 2d 155 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2003)